Article

A Typological Study of Tonal Systems of Japanese and Prinmi: Towards a Definition of Pitch-accent Languages

Picus Sizhi Ding 1
Author Information & Copyright
1Macao Polytechnic Institute

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

Based on the principle of suprasegmental organization in Japanese and Prinmi (a Tibeto-Burman language of China), this paper defines a ‘pitch-accent system’ as one that generates tonal patterns through different placement of a marked tone on a syllable/mora in an underlying domain, which is independent of both the syllable and the word.

Under this definition, the pitch-accent systems of six Japanese dialects can be analyzed uniformly. The diversity of the pitch-accent systems between these Japanese dialects and Prinmi is mainly reflected in: (1) whether or not the marked tone spreads; (2) the direction of spreading and restriction on the scope of spreading; and (3) which edge of the underlying domain is relevant in locating the marked tone.

Keywords: pitch-accent languages; tonal systems; Japanese dialects; Prinmi; Tibeto-Burman

References

1.

Ammon, U. 1994. International Languages. In R. Ashier (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 4, 1723-1730. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

2.

Ammon, U. 2003. The International Standing of the German Language. In J. Maurais & M. Morris (eds.), Languages in a Globalising World 231-249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3.

Barandovská-Frank, V. 1995. La Latina kiel Interlingvo. Dobřichovice: Kava-Pech.

4.

Baron, N. 1994. Computer Languages. In R. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2, 663-670. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

5.

Bastardas i Boada, A. 2002. World Language Policy in the Era of Globalization: Diversity and Intercommunication from the Perspective of 'Complexity'. Available at http://cultura.gencat.net/ llengcat/noves.

6.

Blanke, D. 1985. Internationale Plansprachen. Berlin: Akademie- Verlag.

7.

Blanke, D. 1989. Planned Languages: A Survey of Some of the Main Problems. In K. Schubert & D. Maxwell (eds.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the Science of Planned Languages. Trends in Linguistics 42, 63-87. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

8.

Blanke, D. 1997. The Term "Planned Language". In H. Tonkin (ed.), Esperanto, Interlinguistics, and Planned Language 1-20. Lanham, New York, & Oxford: University Press of America.

9.

Blanke, D. 2001. Vom Entwurf zur Sprache. In K. Schubert (ed.), Planned Languages: From Concept to Reality 37-89. Brussels: Hogeschool voor Wetenschap en Kunst.

10.

Brown, J. 1960. Loglan. Scientific American 202, 53-63.

11.

Corsetti, R. 1999. Kreoliĝo de Esperanto: Inter Personaj Gustoj kaj Oficiala Normo. In D. Blanke, R. McCoy, & O. Buller (eds.), Por Aktiva Lingvopolitiko 43-60. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto- Asocio.

12.

Couturat, L. & L. Leau. 1903. Histoire de la langue universelle. Hildesheim, Zürich, & New York: Olms.

13.

Couturat, L. & L. Leau. 1979. Les nouvelles langues internationales. Hildesheim, Zürich, & New York: Olms.

14.

Crystal, D. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

De Swaan, A. 2001. Words of the World. The Global Language System. Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Duličenko, A. 1989. Ethnic Language and Planned Language. In K. Schubert & D. Maxwell (eds.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the Science of Planned Languages. Trends in Linguistics 42, 47-61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

17.

Duličenko, А. 1990. Mezdunarodnye Vspomogatel'nye Jazyki. Tallinn: Valgus.

18.

Eco, U. 1995. The Search for the Perfect Language. Oxford: Blackwell. Gledhill, C. 2000. The Grammar of Esperanto: A Corpus-based Description. München: Lincom Europa.

19.

Gobbo, F. 2005. The European Union's Need for an International Auxiliary Language. Journal of Universal Language 6, 1-28.

20.

Grin, F. 2005. L'enseignement des langues étrangères comme politique publique. Available at http://cisad.adc.education.fr/hcee/documents/ rapport_Grin.pdf.

21.

Jacob, H. 1947. A Planned Auxiliary Language. London: Dobson.

22.

Janton, P. 1988. Plans for an International Language. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K. Mattheier (eds.), Sociolinguistics 1679-1687. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

23.

Janton, P. 1993. Esperanto: Language, Literature, and Community. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

24.

Jespersen, O. 1928. An International Language. London: Allen & Unwin. Knowlson, J. 1975. Universal Language Schemes in England and France 1600-1800. Toronto & Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.

25.

Künzli, A. 2006. Neutrale Universalsprachen als Alternative: Einige Pragmatische Überlegungen und Anmerkungen zum Thema. In A. Künzli (ed.), Universalaj Lingvoj en Svislando. Svisa Enciklopedio Planlingva 41-68. La Chaux-de-Fonds: CDELI/SES.

26.

Kwak, E. 2003. Comparision between Pidgins and 'Unish'. Journal of Universal Language 4, 17-31.

27.

Kuznecov, S. 1991. Kratkiy Slovar Interlingvistiki Terminov. In M. Isaev (ed.), Problemy Mezdunarodnogo Vspomogatel'nogo Jazyka 71-228. Moskva: Nauka.

28.

Large, A. 1985. The Artificial Language Movement. Oxford: Blackwell. Lee, D. 2002. A Comparison of Unish Grammar with Esperanto. Journal of Universal Language 3, 57-74.

29.

Liu, H. 2001a. Informadika Aspekto de Interlingvistiko. In S. Fiedler & H. Liu (eds.), Interlingvistikaj Studoj: Festschrift für Detlev Blanke zum 60 Geburtstag 147-171. Dobřichovice: Kava-Pech.

30.

Liu, H. 2001b. Pidgins, Creoles, and Planned Languages: Linguistic Development under Special Conditions. In K. Schubert (ed.), Planned Languages: From Concept to Reality 121-177. Brussels: Hogeschool voor Wetenschap en Kunst.

31.

Liu, H. 2006. Kio Estas KOD? Kiel ĝi Funkciu? Informilo por Interlingvistoj 2, 2-5.

32.

Maxwell, D. 1989. Principles for Constructing Planned Languages. In K. Schubert & D. Maxwell (eds.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the Science of Planned Languages. Trends in Linguistic 42, 101-119. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

33.

Mühlhäusler, P. 1997. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. London: University of Westminister Press.

34.

Nuessel, F. 2000. The Esperanto Language. New York, Ottawa, & Toronto: Legas.

35.

Pei, M. 1958. One Language for the World. New York: Biblo and Tannen.

36.

Phillipson, R. 1999. International Languages and International Human Rights. In M. Kontra, R. Phillipson, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & T. Varady (eds.), Language: A Right and a Resource. Approaching Linguistic Human Rights 25-46. Budapest: Central European University Press.

37.

Piron, C. 1981. Esperanto: European or Asiatic Language? Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.

38.

Schubert, K. 1989. Interlinguistics: Its Aims, its Achievements, and its Place in Language Science. In K. Schubert & D. Maxwell (eds.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the Science of Planned Languages. Trends in Linguistics 42, 7-44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

39.

Schubert, K. 2004. Interkulturelle Sprache. In I. Müller (ed.), Und sie Bewegt sich Doch: Translationswissenschaft in Ost und West. Festschrift für Heidemarie Salevsky zum 60 Geburtstag 319-331. Frankfurt am Main u.a.: Lang.

40.

Slaughter, M. 1982. Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Strasser, G. 1988. Lingua Universalis. Kryptologie und Theorie der Universalsprachen im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

42.

Szilágyi, D. 1931. Versus Interlinguistica. In Haupenthal (ed.), Plansprachen. Beiträge zur Interlinguistik 163-187. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.

43.

Van Parijs, P. 2003. Europe's Three Language Problems. Prepared for D. Castiglione & C. Longman (eds.), The Challenge of Multilingualism in Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart. Available at <http://www.etes.ucl. ac.be/Publications/dochs.htm>.

44.

Versteegh, K. 1993. Esperanto as a First Language: Language Acquisition with a Restricted Input. Linguistics 31, 539-555.

45.

Wells, J. 1978. Lingvistikaj Aspektoj de Esperanto. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.

46.

Wood, R. 1979. A Voluntary Non-ethnic, Non-territorial Speech Community. In W. Mackey & J. Ornstein (eds.), Socio-linguistic Studies in Language Contact 433-450. New York: The Hague & Paris: Mouton.

47.

Wright, S. 2000. Community and Communication: The Role of Language in Nation State Building and European Integration. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

The Journal of Universal Language, published by Sejong University Language Research Institute, has again been selected as a certified academic journal by the Korean Citation Index in 2021.

Our sincere gratitude goes to the editorial committee and researchers for their dedicated support.

We at the JUL remain committed to delivering a journal of the highest quality to our worldwide readership.


I don't want to open this window for a day.