Article

The Word Order of Estonian: Implications to Universal Language

Martin Ehala 1
Author Information & Copyright
1Tallinn University

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

Estonian is most often considered a SVO language. However, in main clauses, SVX and XVS are equally frequent, which indicates that Estonian has the V2 phenomenon. In subordinate clauses, Estonian shows a quite high proportion of verb final order. The picture becomes more complex when the position of the auxiliary verb (I) in verbal complexes is taken into account: Estonian seems to have a SIOV order. Historically this order has been stable for several centuries. The results of the study cast a doubt on the generality of word order universals proposed in the literature. The article argues that instead of grammatical principles of word order, the rules of ordering given and new information are universal. It is proposed that V2 is the preferred constituent order for artificial languages and that the thematic roles rather than grammatical categories should be linguistically coded.

Keywords: word order; Estonian; syntactic universals; universal language

References

1.

Battye, A. & I. Roberts. 1993. Introduction. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change 1-30. New York & Oxford: OUP.

2.

Bech, G. 1955. Studien über das Deutsche Verbum Infinitum. Niemeyer: Tübingen.

3.

Besten, H. den & J. Rutten. 1989. On Verb Raising, Extraposition, and Free Word Order in Dutch. In D. Jaspers, W. Klooster, Y. Putseys, & P. Seuren (eds.), Sentential Complementation and Lexicon. Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest 41-56. Dordrecht: Foris.

4.

Bean, M. 1983. The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English. London & Canberra: Croom Helm.

5.

Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.

6.

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

7.

Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

8.

Dryer, M. 1992. The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations. Language 68, 81-138.

9.

Dryer, M. 1997. Are Grammatical Relations Universal? In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type 115-143. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

10.

Ehala, M. 1998. How a Man Changed a Parameter Value: The Loss of SOV in Estonian Subclauses. In R. Hogg & L. van Bergen (eds.), Historical Linguistics II: Germanic Lnguistics 73-88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

11.

Erelt, M., R. Kasik, H. Metslang, H. Rajandi, K. Ross, H. Saari, K. Tael, & ja S. Vare. 1993. Eesti keele grammatika II. Tallinn: TA Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.

12.

Fanselow, G. 2003. Free Constituent Order: A Minimalist Interface Account. Folia Linguistica 37, 191-231.

13.

Gerritsen, M. 1984. Divergent Word Order Developments in Germanic Languages: A Description and a Tentative Explanation. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax. Mouton de Guyter: Amsterdam.

14.

Greenberg, H. 1966. Universals of Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

15.

Haegeman, L. & H. van Riemsdijk. 1986. Verb Projection Raising, Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 417- 66.

16.

Haegeman, L. & H. van Riemsdijk. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

17.

Haegeman, L. & H. van Riemsdijk. 1994. Verb Raising as Verb Projection Raising: Some Empirical Problems. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 509-522.

18.

Haegeman, L. & H. van Riemsdijk. 1998. V-positions and the Middle Field in West Flemish. Syntax 1.3, 259-299.

19.

Helbig, G. & J. Buscha. 1994. Deutsche Grammatik. Leibzig: Langenscheidt.

20.

Holmberg, A., U. Nikanne, I. Oraviita, H. Reime, & T. Trosterud. 1993. The Structure of INFL and the Finite Clause in Finnish. In A. Holmberg & U. Nikanne (eds.), Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax 176-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

21.

Huumo, T. 1995. Näkökulma Suomen ja Viron sanajärjestyseroihin. In H. Sulkala & H. Laanekask (eds.), Lähivertailua 8, 21-39. Oulu: Oulu University Press.

22.

Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

23.

Kemper, S., R. Herman, & C. Liu. 2004. Sentence Production by Young and Older Adults in Controlled Contexts. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science 59, 220-224.

24.

Kiparsky, P. 1996. The Shift to Head Initial VP in Germanic. In H. Thrainsson (ed.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, 140-179. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

25.

Kiss, K. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Reidel & Akademiai Kiado.

26.

Kroch, A. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199-244.

27.

Käi, P. 1997. Eesti keele kõrvallause sõnajärg eri eagruppide kõnes. An Unpublished MA Dissertation. Tallinn: Tallinn Pedagogical University.

28.

LaPolla, R. 1995. Pragmatic Relations and Word Order in Chinese. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (eds.), Word Order in Discourse 299-331. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

29.

LaPolla, R. 2002. A Problem with Word Order Typology: Differing Uses of Word Order among Languages. Research Center for Linguistic Typology 1-14. Melbourne: Institute for Advanced Study, La Trobe University.

30.

Lightfoot, D. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31.

Lightfoot, D. & N. Hornstein. 1994. (ed.) Verb Movement. Cambridge: CUP.

32.

Lindström, L. 2000. Narratiiv ja selle sõnajärg. Keel ja Kirjandus 3, 190- 200.

33.

Müller, G. 1999. Zur Ableitung der NP Adv V Stellung im Deutschen. In J. Bayer & C. Römer (eds.), Von der Philologie zur Grammatiktheorie 117-138. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

34.

Normann, E. (ed.) 1955. Valimik eesti vanasõnu. Tallinn: Eesti Riiklik Kirjastus.

35.

Odden, D. 2003. Languages and Universals. Journal of Universal Language 33-74.

36.

Põldmäe, R. (ed.) 1941. Eesti rahvanaljandid, I. Inimese eluperioodid. Tartu: Teaduslik Kirjandus.

37.

Roberts, I. 1997. Comparative Syntax. London: Arnold.

38.

Remmel, N. 1963. Sõnajärjestus eesti Lauses. Deskriptiivne käsitlus. Eesti keele süntaksi küsimusi 216-271. Tallinn: Eesti Riiklik Kirjastus.

39.

Sahkai, H. 1999. Eesti verbifraasi sõnajärg. Keel ja kirjandus 1, 24-32. Sampson, G. 1997. Depth in English Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 33, 131-151.

40.

Stuurman, F. 1985. X-Bar and X-Plain. A Study of X-Bar Theories of the Phrase Structure Component. Dordrecht: Foris.

41.

Tael, K. 1988. Sõnajärjemallid eesti keeles (võrrelduna soome keelega). Tallinn: TA Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.

42.

Tauli, V. 1983. The Estonian Language Reform. In I. Fodor & C. Hagége (eds.), Language Reform. History and Future 2, 309-330 Hamburg: Buske Verlag.

43.

Tesnière, L. 1959. Elements de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.

44.

Trosterud, T. 1996. Die Südsamische Wortfolge al Seine Kombination der Deutschen und der Marischen Wortfolge Analysiert. In Lapponica et Uralica. 100 Jahre Finnisch-Ugrischer Unterricht an der Universität Uppsala. Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 26, 103-112. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

45.

Valgma, J & N. Remmel. 1968. Eesti keele grammatika. Tallinn: Valgus.

46.

Vennemann, T. 1974. Theoretical Word Order Studies: Results and Problems. Papiere zur Linguistik 7, 5-25.

47.

Vennemann, T. 1981. Typology, Universals and Change of Language. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Historical Syntax, Poznan, March 1981.

48.

Vikner, S. 1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb Movement 117-147. Cambridge: CUP.

49.

Vilkuna M. 1989. Free Word Order in Finnish: Its Syntax and Discourse Functions. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

50.

Vilkuna M. 1998. Word Order in European Uralic. In A. Siewierska (ed.), Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe 173-233. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

51.

Yngve, V. 1960. A Model and a Hypothesis for Language Structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104, 444-466.

JUL Research Ethics Workshop

July 1-2, 2020   

For further detailed information, please contact us (unish@sejong.ac.kr).


I don't want to open this window for a day.

JUL Research Ethics Workshop

January 8-9, 2020   

For further detailed information, please contact us (unish@sejong.ac.kr).


I don't want to open this window for a day.