Article

Reported Speech: Towards a Definition as a Communicative and Linguistic Universal

Annamaria Cacchione 1
Author Information & Copyright
1La Sapienza University of Rome

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

Reported speech is a structure that has quite always been investigated from a formal point of view, as the syntactical means by which we can construct the oratio, choosing between embedding or un-embedding sentences, respectively within oratio obliqua or oratio recta. The purpose of this essay is arguing that reported speech corresponds to a universal communicative function, the reporting function, which can realize and show itself as a multiplicity of forms, grouped around few main types, among which one in particular—direct speech—can be considered its formal universal side. So we will first define the traditional syntactical account of RS; next, we will turn to a wider perspective, in which functions are prior then forms. The functional and pragmatic account of RS will be considered the proper theoretical framework in order to identify the universal features of reporting. Finally, we will present the results of some sperimental researches about the acquisition of RS both in L1 and L2. The results will allow us to confirm the main hypotheses: the universality of RS as a basic communicative function, and the universality of (at last) one formal fulfillment of it, the direct speech, related to its prototypical narrative function.

Keywords: reported speech; narrative; rhetoric; direct and indirect speech; theory of mind; L1 and L2 acquisition;

References

1.

Baynham, M. 1996. Direct Speech: What's it Doing in Non-narrative Discourse? Journal of Pragmatics 25, 61-81.

2.

Blum-Kulka, S. 2004. The Role of Peer Interaction in Later Pragmatic Development: The Case of Speech Representation. In R. Berman (ed.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence: Psycholinguistic and Crosslinguistic Perspectives. TILAR Series 191- 210. Amsterdam & New York: John Benjamins.

3.

Boogaart, R. 1996. Tense and Temporal Ordering in English and Dutch Indirect Speech. In T. Janssen & W. Wurff (eds.), Reported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb 21-236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

4.

Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

5.

Calaresu, M. 2000. Il discorso riportato. Una prospettiva testuale. Modena: Il Fiorino.

6.

Calaresu, M. 2004. Testuali parole. La dimensione pragmatica e testuale del discorso riportato. Milano: Franco Angeli.

7.

Calleri, D., M. Chini, P. Cordin, & S. Ferraris. 2003. Confronti tra l'acquisizione di Italiano L1 e l'acquisizione di Italiano L2. In A. Ramat (ed.), Verso lIitaliano. Percorsi e strategie di acquisizione 220-253. Roma: Carocci.

8.

Castellano, C., R. Bahr, & E. Silliman. 2003. Oral-written Contrasts of Quoted Dialogue Frames in Older Children. Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Chicago, Illinois, November 15, 2003.

9.

Clark, H. & R. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as Demonstrations. Language 66. 4, 764-805.

10.

Ebert, K. 1986. Reported Speech in Some Languages of Nepal. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech 145-160. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

11.

Gonzàlez, M. 2004. Pragmatic Markers in Oral Narrative. The Case of English and Catalan. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

12.

Haberland, H. 1986. Reported Speech in Danish. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech 219-254. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

13.

Haverkate, H. 1996. Modal Patterns of Direct and Indirect Discourse in Peninsular Spanish: An Analysis within the Framework of Speech Act Typology. In T. Janssen & W. Wurff (eds.), Reported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb 97-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

14.

Hickmann, M. 1993. The Boundaries of Reported Speech in Narrative Discourse: Some Developmental Aspects in Reflexive Language. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language 63-88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Hockett, C. 1966. The Problem of Universals in Language. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Languages 1-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Hockett, C. 1968. The State of the Art. L'Aja: Mouton de Gruyter.

17.

Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

18.

Labov, W. & J. Waletsky. 1967. Speech Actions and Reactions in Personal Narrative. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk 219-247. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

19.

Li, Ch. 1986. Direct and Indirect Speech: A Functional Study. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech 29-46. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

20.

Massamba, D. 1986. Reported Speech in Swahili. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech 99-120. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

21.

Maynard, S. 1986. The Particle -o and Content-oriented Indirect Speech in Japanese Written Discourse. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech 179-200. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

22.

Nordqvist, Å. 2001. The Use of Direct and Indirect Speech by 1 1/2- to 4- year-olds. Psychology of Language and Communication 5.1, 21-45.

23.

Simone, R. 1990. Fondamenti di linguistica. Bari: Laterza.

24.

Tannen, D. 1988. Hearing Voices in Conversation, Fiction, and Mixed Genres. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding 89-113. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

25.

Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Vincent, D. & L. Perrin. 1999. On the Narrative vs. Non-narrative Functions of Reported Speech: A Socio-pragmatic Study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.3, 291-313.

27.

Wolf, D. & D. Hicks. 1989. The Voices within Narratives: The Development of Intertextuality in Young Children's Stories. Discourses and Processes 12, 329-351.

28.

Wurff, W. 1996. Sequence of Tenses in English and Bengali. In T. Janssen & W. Wurff (eds.), Reported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb 261-288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.