Article

Situation Aspect as a Universal Aspect*: Implications for Artificial Languages

Zhonghua Xiao1, Anthony McEnery1
Author Information & Copyright
1The University of Lancaster

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

Aspect, as one of the elements of verb mechanics, has been over- looked by many language designers. This paper argues that an artificial language, designed as a universal language for international communication, should incorporate the “universal" component of aspect found cross-linguistically in natural languages. In doing so, the paper develops a two-level model of situation aspect in which situation aspect is modelled as verb classes at the lexical level and as situation types at the sentential level. With a framework consisting of a lexicon, a layered clause structure and a set of mapping rules, the model is developed and tested using an English corpus and a Chinese corpus.

Keywords: artificial language; situation aspect; universality

References

1.

Brinton, L. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual System.

2.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3.

Bybee, J., R. Perkins, & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of.

4.

Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

5.

Carlson, G. 1977. Bare Plurals and the English Kind. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413-457.

6.

Carlson, L. 1981. Aspect and Quantification. In P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds.), Tense and Aspect (Syntax and Semantics 14) 31-64. New York: Academic Press.

7.

Caviness, K. 1999. Ken Caviness Responds to Bruce R: Gilson's Message. Available at URL <http: personal.southern.edu caviness Eo_unue KCrespondas.html>.

8.

Chandler, J. 1997. Esperanto by L. L. Zamenhof: A Critique. Available at URL <http: www.geocities.com Athens Forum 5037 Esp.html>.

9.

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Davis, S. 2002. Syllable Structure for an Artificial Language Based on Universal Principles. Journal of Universal Language 3, 3-15.

11.

Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.

12.

Eddy, G. 2002. Why Esperanto is not my Favourite Artificial Language. Available at URL <http: www.cix.co.uk �morven lang esp.html# refs>.

13.

Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

14.

Gledhill, C. 2001. The Grammar of Esperanto (Languages of the World Materials 190). Muenchen: Lincom Europa.

15.

Harrison, R. 1992. Guidelines for the Design of an International Auxiliary Language. Available at URL <http:. ri.xu.org conlang conl92c.txt>.

16.

Harrison, R. 1996. Verb Aspect. Available at URL <http: www. invisiblelighthouse.com langlab aspect.html>.

17.

Hundt, M., A. Sand, & R. Siemund. 1998. Manual of Information to Accompany the Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English("FLOB") Available at URL <http: www.hit.uib.no icame flob index.htm>.

18.

Jendraschek, G. 2002. The Struggle against Monolingualism. Journal of Universal Language 3, 55-75.

19.

Kennaway, R. 2002. Some Internet Resources Relating to Constructed Languages. Available at URL <http: www.sys. ac.uk �j conlang.html>.

20.

Kim, S. 2001. Toward the Third Millennium: One WWL via WCO. Journal of Universal Language 2, 70-83.

21.

Leech, G. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.

22.

Leech, G. 1991. The State of Art in Corpus Linguistics. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics 8-29. London: Longman.

23.

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Lys, F. & K. Mommer. 1986. The Problem of Aspectual Verb Classification: A Two-level Approach. Chicago Linguistics Society 22.2, 217-230.

25.

Matthews, S. 1990. A Cognitive Approach to the Typology of Verb Aspect. Doctoral Dissertation, Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.

26.

McEnery, A. & A. Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

27.

Moens, M. 1987. Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference. Doctoral Dissertation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.

28.

Moens, M. & M. Steedman. 1988. Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference. Computational Linguistics 14, 15-28.

29.

Olsen, M. 1994. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Lexical Aspect Features. Studies in the Linguistic Science 24, 361-375.

30.

Peterson, P. 1997. Fact, Proposition, Event. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

31.

Temporal Relations in English and German Nar- rative Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.

32.

Siewierska, A. 1991. Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.

33.

Smith, C. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

34.

Sweester, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

36.

van Valin, R. 2002. A Brief Overview of Role and Reference Grammar. Available at URL http: wings.buffalo.edu linguistics research rrg rrg_paper.html.

37.

van Voorst, J. 1988. Event Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

38.

Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press.

39.

Verkuyl, H. 1989. Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 39-94.

40.

Verkuyl, H. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Xiao, Z. 2002. A Corpus-based Study of Aspect in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral Dissertation, Lancaster: Lancaster University.

42.

Xiao, Z. & A. McEnery. 2002. Situation Aspect: A Two-level Approach. Presented in The 5th Chronos Colloquium on Tense, Aspect and Modality. Groningen, the Netherlands.

43.

Yang, S. 1995. The Aspectual System of Chinese. Doctoral Dissertation, Victoria: University of Victoria.

44.

Zhang, L. 1995. A Contrastive Study of Aspectuality in German,English and Chinese (Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics 19). New York: Peter Lang.