Journal of Universal Language
Sejong University Language Research Institue
Article

Three Cross-linguistic Tendencies in Reduplication Revised

Jin-young Tak1
1Sejong University

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

This paper examines how three languages (i.e., Chichewa, Sesotho, Agta) comply with three cross-linguistic tendencies in reduplication (i.e., Shape Invariance, Unmarkedness, and Identity discussed by Kager (1999)) from the perspective of Typology. Considering that Chichewa is characterized as total (i.e., stem) reduplication, Sesotho as bisyllabic reduplication, and Agta as closed-syllable reduplication, this paper is to shows that there is a conflict among these three universal tendencies in reduplication. For example, Unmarkedness, conspiring a reduplicant to a bisyllabic reduplicative template (Kager 1999), cannot account for the occurrence of stem reduplication. In the same sense, Identity supports the occurrence of stem reduplication. A closed-syllable reduplicative template in Agta violates the Unmarkedness and Identity tendencies. Given these observations, in this paper a language-specific tendency preference mechanism with respect to Shape Invariance, Unmarkedness, and Identity is proposed to account for the occurrence of these three types of reduplication. Although the three languages seem to display three different reduplication patterns, three cross-linguistic tendencies in reduplication may be well-kept in these languages by adopting the tendency preference mechanism specific to a language.

Keywords: Shape Invariance; Unmarkedness; Identity; reduplication; reduplicative template; cross-linguistic tendency; bisyllabic; stem; closed syllable; tendency preference mechanism

References

1.

Bleek, H. 1862. A Comparative Grammar of South African Languages. Part I. Phonology. London: Trübner.

2.

Doke, C. 1957. Textbook of Southern Sotho Grammar. Jahannesburg: Longman Southern Africa LTD.

3.

Downing, L. 1997. Correspondence Effects in Ndebele Reduplication. Studies in the Linguistic Science 25, 81-95.

4.

Downing, L. 1999a. Morphological Constraints on Bantu Reduplication. Linguistic Analysis 29, 6-44.

5.

Downing, L. 1999b. Prosodic Stem ≠ Prosodic Word in Bantu: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Proceedings of Berlin Conference on the Phonological Word, 73-98.

6.

Greenberg, J. 1963. The Languages in Africa. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

7.

Guma, E. 1971. An Outline Structure of Southern Sotho. Pietermaritzburg: Shuter and Shooter.

8.

Guthrie, M. 1967-71. Comparative Bantu. Farnborough: Gregg Press, Ltd. Hyman, L., S. Inkelas & G. Shibanda. 1998. Morphological Correspondence in Bantu Reduplication. ROA 437.

9.

Inkelas, S. & C. Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Kenstowicz, M. 1997. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

12.

Kulemeka, A. 1993 Chichewa I. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

13.

Marantz, A. 1982. Re Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 435-483.

14.

McCarthy, J. & A. Prince. 1986. Prosodic Morphology. Ms. Waltham: Brandeis University.

15.

McCarthy, J. & A. Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, 249-384.

16.

McNally, L. 1990. Multiplanar Reduplication: Evidence from Sesotho. The Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 5, 331-346.

17.

Mtenje, A. 1988. On Tone and Transfer in Chichewa Reduplication. Linguistics 26, 125-155.

18.

Myers-Scotton, C. 1980a. Peace Crops Language Handbook Series: Chichewa I. East Lancing, MI: The African Studies Center.

19.

Myers-Scotton, C. 1980b. Peace Crops Language Handbook Series: Chichewa II. East Lancing, MI: The African Studies Center.

20.

Nurse, D. 2002. A Survey Report for the Bantu Languages. Available via http://www.sil.org/silesr/2002/016/SILESR2002-016.htm.

21.

Park, J. 1997. Minimal Word Effects with Special Reference to Swahili. Ph. D. Dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

22.

Rogers, C. 1989. The Stem and Verbal Reduplication in Chichewa. Ms., Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

23.

Steriade, Donca. 1988. Reduplication and Syllable Transfer in Sanskrit and Elsewhere. Phonology 5, 73-155.

24.

Tak, J. 2003. Verbal Reduplication in Some Bantu Languages: A Diachronic Approach. Journal of Linguistics 35, 261-292.

25.

Tak, J. 2005. Cophonology and Morphological Doubling Theory in Bantu Verbal Reduplication. Korean Journal of Linguistics 30.2, 369-393.

26.

Wald, B. 1987. Swahili and the Bantu Languages. In B. Comrie (ed.), The World's Major Languages 991-1014. London: Croom Helm.

27.

Wilbur, Ronnie. 1973. The Phonology of Reduplication. Ph. D. Dissertation. Urbana- Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

28.

Williamson, K. 1989. The Niger-Congo Languages. In J. Bendor-Samuel. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.