Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Journal of Universal Language
Sejong University Language Research Institue

J. Univers. Lang. 2010; 11(1):137-154

pISSN: 1598-6381

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2010.11.1.137

Article

A Case Study of Intra-sentence Conjunctions in English-Chinese Legal Parallel Texts Yihe or Xinghe?

Yan Xi1
1University of Macau

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

Abstract

In the fields of translation studies in China, there is a perpetual argument regarding Yihe ( 意合, Parataxis) and Xinghe ( 形合,

Hypotaxis). Most scholars believe that there are more cases of conjunction in the English texts than in the Chinese ones because it is generally considered that Chinese is predominantly paratactic and English mainly hypotactic. Through a case study of explicitation of conjunctions in Chinese-English legal parallel texts, the results show that more intra-sentence conjunctions are used in the two translations than their respective source texts. The notions of Yihe and Xinghe do not seem to account for the increased use of intra- sentence conjunctions in legal translation. Instead, explicitation of cohesive devices and grammatical differences between Chinese and English play important roles in more use of intra-sentence conjunctions in legal translation. Through an investigation of Yihe and Xinghe from the perspective of translation universals, this study aims to test the explanatory force of Yihe and Xinghe in the use of conjunction in legal texts and give a clearer picture of conjunction in Chinese and English legal parallel texts, and therefore will reconstruct the discourse on Chinese and English languages.

Keywords: Yihe; Xinghe; explicitation; conjunction; legal parallel texts

REFERENCES

1.

Blum-Kulka, S. 2004. Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Trans- lation. In L. Venuti (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 290-305.

2.

Chan, S. W. 2004. A Dictionary of Translation Technology. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

3.

Fawcett, P. 1997. Translation and Language: Linguistic Theories Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

4.

Filipovic, R. 1984. What Are the Primary Data for Contrastive Analysis? In J. Fisiak (ed.), Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems 107-117. Berlin: Mouton.

5.

Halliday, M. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.

6.

Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London:.

7.

Longman. Hartmann, R. 1980. Contrastive Textology: Comparative Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.

8.

James, C. 1980. Contrastive Analysis. London: Longman.

9.

Lian, S. 1993. Contrastive Studies of English and Chinese. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

10.

Liu, M. 1992. Contrastive Studies of Chinese and English for Translation. Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Publishing House.

11.

Nida, E. 2004. Toward a Science of Translating. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

12.

Pan, W. 1997. Hanying duibi gangyao. (Essentials of Contrastive Studies of Chinese and English). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.

13.

Quirk, R. et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

14.

Qian, Y. et al. (eds.) 1986. Selected Readings on Laws and Practices in International Trade. Beijing: University of International Business and Economics Press.

15.

Wang, L. 1959. Modern Chinese Grammar. Hong Kong: Chung Hwa Book Corp.