Journal of Universal Language
Sejong University Language Research Institue
Article

The Prospects for an International Language

Andrew Large1,
1Mcgrill University, Montreal
Corresponding Author : Andrew Large, Director and Professor, Graduate School of Liberary & Information Studies McGrill University, Montreal, Canada, 3459 Mctavish, Quebec H3A IYI

Copyright ⓒ 2016, Sejong University Language Research Institue. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jan 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

Reviews the various arguments that have been advanced since the seventeenth century in favor of adopting one common language for international communication. Discusses the barriers that have prevented any constructed language from assuming this role. Considers the possibility of a natural language acting as a medium for international communication and in Particular evaluates the extent to which English now occupies this position.


References

1.

Baik, Martin Jonghak (1994). Syntactic features of Englishisation in Korean World Englishes 13 (2) 155-166.

2.

Beneke, Jurgon (1981). Cultural monsters, mimicry and English as an international language. Language Incorporated: Teaching Foreign Languages in Industry. London: Pergamon.

3.

Boulton, Marjorie (I960). Zamenhof, Creator of Esperanto. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

4.

Crystal, David (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

5.

Cumming. John D. (1995). The Internet and the English language. English Today 11(1) 3-8

6.

De Swaan. Abram (1991). Notes on the emerging global language system: regional, national and supranational. Media, Culture and Society 13, 309-323

7.

Decsy, Gyula (1993). Europe's linguistic future: the Eurish problem, Eurasian Studies Yearbook 63,7-18.

8.

Dulicenko, Aleksandr Dmitrievic (1989). Ethnic language and planned language.

9.

Fixman, Carol S. (1990). The foreign language needs of US-based corporations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 511,2546

10.

Garfield. Eugene & Welljams-Dorof, Alfred (1990). Language use in international research: a citation analysis. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 511, 10-24

11.

Glossop, Ronald J. (1988). Language policy. In Klaus Schubert.Interlinguistics: Aspects of the Science of Planned Languages. Berlin: Mouton, p. 47-61y and a just world order. Alternatives 13 ⑶:395"409.

12.

Guerard, A.L. (1945). Europe Free and United. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

13.

Jinyoung, Rosa (1994). Englishised Korean: structure, status and attitudes. World Englishes 13 (2) 225-244

14.

Large, Andrew (1985). The Artificial Language Movement. Oxford: A. Blackwell.

15.

Maxwell, Dan (1988). On the acquisition of Esperanto. SSLA 10, 51-61

16.

Pei, Mario (1958). One Language for the World. New York: Devin- Adair.

17.

Peter, Steve (1994). Norma and meaning potential. World Englishes 13 ⑶ 387-394

18.

Piron. Claude (1989). A few notes on the evolution of Esperanto. In Klaus Schubert. Interlinguistics: Aspects of the Science of Planned Languages. Berlin: Mouton, p. 129-142.

19.

Pollack, Andrew (1995). English becomes sensitive topic in the global village's Net The Gazette 13 August, B1, B6.

20.

Reeves, Nigel B.R. (1990). The foreign language needs of UK-bases corporations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 511, 60-73

21.

Sonnenfeld, Ernesto (1988). Cu Esperanto estas europa lingvo? La Revuo Oreinta 69 (4) 4-8.

22.

Wilkins. John (1668).An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London: Sa. Gellibrand & John Martin.